Who am I, if I'm not myself?

My Photo
A compulsive sketcher with a love of comicbooks, film, and politics.  A tired, yet happy father.  His joy is tinged with cynicism; his sorrow with a laugh.  A balding, liberal long-hair who'd finish the job with a razor, but is in no rush to be thought a nazi biker from prison.  Twice the man you are, unless you weigh over 140 or are a woman.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

I have no idea where I was going with this.

[From April 09]

Rational thought (a system or as a line of thinking) is not inerrant. It is not supernaturally endowed with its own special light. It is, more often than not, done in pursuit of rationalising our dispositions, prejudices, and actions. But this does not deny its usefulness, or condemn such thinking to the patent absurdity of gibberish. Instead, it makes the rational into a real practice, like others: fallible, common, and not some shining ideal.

Rendering such thinking little more than an attempt to fashion itself into something more internally consistent, and perhaps better in tune with the world it is a part of,

0 comments:

Post a Comment