Skip to main content

James O'Barr's The Crow, Wagner & Mireault's Grendel: The Devil Inside

The Crow, recently back in print, is at once great and terrible. It is the comicbook equivalent of a John Cartpenter movie if Carpenter were a goth art-school grad from Detroit. It reeks of the '80s and silly, but serious goth-drama. It has a scene where the lead character cuts his arms in mock suicide, bandages them up like a martial artist, and then performs a page or two of dance (in front of his cat), presumably all out of sadness. It is gleefully violent. It doesn't really bother explaining itself, but tosses in poems and acute musical references at whim. It finishes up with a 'coda' from someone uninvolved in the making of the book, which stands as one of the silliest pieces of pan-religious paganism I've ever read.

To top it off, the author seems oblivious to the campiness of his work. If Wikipedia can be trusted, he has said of it, "There is pure anger on each page." Regardless of that quote's authenticity or context, The Crow seems unaware of its own campy charms. Just like the crazed religious tract at the end, this nearly painful ignorance only serves to make the book more entertaining.

I highly recommend it to long time comicbook fans, who should be able to appreciate its pulpiness, but would suggest everyone else stick to the Brandon Lee flick instead. Young teenagers prone to angst and naively taking themselves too seriously should probably stay away, too, though they just might love it.

In contrast to this, I read Grendel: The Devil Inside today. This is an artsy, '80s book dealing with violence, the big city's decay, otherworldly forces, and their effects upon an individual, much like The Crow. But The Devil Inside has some really cool writing, and the art has moments of brilliance. Both come with a taste of madness. This one is much shorter, more concentrated, and less haphazard than O'Barr's ode to taking self pity out on others. It feels personal, but in a distanced way. Whereas O'Barr's work has an alienating factor in its unintentional goofiness, Grendel knows you know, and it doesn't care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For Every Problem, a Solution (4)

God as depicted throughout the ages.  No Alanis Morissette, and, no, that isn't ironic.

An introduction to a book that doesn't exist:

Prose and verse are generally accepted as distinct writing formats with their own rules, styles, and grammars.  Though their borders are somewhat vague, they have come to be seen as something of a dichotomy in the eyes of the general public.  There are, however, at least 3 other popular approaches to writing as exhibited in picture-books, comicbooks, and plays.  Though sometimes given short shrift, these styles are accepted as literature.  They are included in libraries, book stores, and academic study.  Most importantly, they are read. In the general case, there is clearly writing being done in the creation of any one of these.  But what of the wordless comic or silent play?  Should we consider scripts written, but fully realized plays, comics, and picture-books, to be performance, art, or some other kind of non-literature?  These worries of theory are kinks to be worked out, surely, but they are not of immediate practical concern to the writer...

My room is a mess, my painting unfinished.

...and I still haven't found a good alternative to my scanner with its missing power-cord.  Almost finished with this painting, though.  I just need to put in a bus seat in front of and behind the passenger. Incidentally, the Seattle Metro buses have the ugliest upholstery I can remember seeing, and I spent five years working at a used furniture store.