Skip to main content

A few political thoughts:

-Obama has recently made several appearances where he said, approximately, "Don't bet against the American worker." Yesterday, he began to turn the corner on this argument, and intimate that the Republicans (whom he termed 'the party of "no" crowd') had broken this maxim by opposing government aid to and intervention in the auto industry (and, now, for small businesses). I expect to see this line of thought to be extended, firmed up, and ramped up until our president feels comfortable saying the 'Republicans in Congress' are betting against America. Gonna have to move quick there, if they want to have time for the message to sink in nationally before the midterms.


-Chris Matthews, among others, has claimed to see big trouble for Democrats if the Justice Department is successful in either declawing or striking down Arizona's racist anti-apparent-immigrant laws. Right now, Hispanics account for roughly 15 percent of the US population. The Census bureau projects this number will go up by a little more than 2.2 every ten years, such that Hispanics will account for just under 25% of the populace by 2050. They are already the nation's largest minority.

I don't see clear support of racism against Hispanics being a good long or short term strategy for Republicans (particularly outside of red districts), but maybe I'm just not hip to the new, Southwest version of the Southern Strategy. Considering the percentage of the US population which is white is dwindling (down from 69.4% in 2000 to 65.1% in 2010, and expected to drop to 50.1 by 2050), I doubt this remix will be as big of a hit as was Nixon's original piece.


-I am tired of hearing people say Reagan spent us into massive debt to destroy the Soviet empire and end the Cold War. He didn't know that would happen. I defy anyone to show me serious evidence that he or his advisors predicted anything akin to that. Sovietologists were surprised when Russian socialism imploded. Reagan wasn't prescient, nor was he better informed than his top advisors.

He spent a lot of money, drove us into trillions of dollars of debt, and massively inflated the defence industry because he had a vision involving lasers in space, missile defence systems we still can't work out, and all sorts of cool stuff which probably would have made a very neat sci-fi setting for an early George Lucas film (like, say, Star Wars), but could not have been predicted to get us anything useful. Such foolish action doesn't become smart just because of a serendipitous upshot. Reagan's undying charisma shouldn't get him unearned, nonsensical accolades, no matter how many right-wingers clamber for them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to a book that doesn't exist:

Prose and verse are generally accepted as distinct writing formats with their own rules, styles, and grammars.  Though their borders are somewhat vague, they have come to be seen as something of a dichotomy in the eyes of the general public.  There are, however, at least 3 other popular approaches to writing as exhibited in picture-books, comicbooks, and plays.  Though sometimes given short shrift, these styles are accepted as literature.  They are included in libraries, book stores, and academic study.  Most importantly, they are read. In the general case, there is clearly writing being done in the creation of any one of these.  But what of the wordless comic or silent play?  Should we consider scripts written, but fully realized plays, comics, and picture-books, to be performance, art, or some other kind of non-literature?  These worries of theory are kinks to be worked out, surely, but they are not of immediate practical concern to the writer...

Every thief must go.

Robin , chapter 5  Previous Chapter Robin kept herself busy through her unemployment doing chores and practising martial arts, but mostly she spent time playing in the woods.  The bears avoided her, and she kept out of the thieves' way, as much as she could.  This was no easy task, for Sherman's Forest had its share of scoundrels. Chief of these was Lance Bucskin, infamous for scamming old ladies and still more renowned for his hatred of puppies, which he would kick whenever the chance arose.  Even his own men found his proclivities distasteful, but he had a way with weapons and highway robbery which held his fellows in awe. LANCE-- [clad in all green with a pointed cap; has a devil may care attitude; close cropped blond hair with a well waxed van dyke beard; 28 and in peak condition, he loves exhibiting his physical prowess as much as he enjoys booting little dogs; he is holding up a family as his rapt minions stand by] They're really not all that hard to im...

Reading requires effort, but so does lying about it.

It's in the very first sentence. Right wingers, Republicans, and libertarians who flog the Constitution of the United Sates of America to push their ideology of 'limited government' (except in matters of defence) have forgotten their sacred document's preamble.  "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."  According to the Constitution, a founding purpose of the government it forms (and continues to inform) was to "promote the general Welfare".  Now, one may argue as to what policies do just that, but one cannot claim the Constitution makes no provision for it without either lying or being grossly ignorant of the writings in question.  Though it is against my...