Skip to main content

Okay, so Newsweek's Michelle Bachman cover was stupid.

That magazine has unfortunately become a rag under its current editor in chief.  However!  Is a crazy cover-picture (and title) choice, which gives even greater excuse for right-wingers to complain about the 'liberal media', excusable if it leads to something awesome?  As a principle, probably not.  But in this case, maybe so.  Observe:

Mitt Romney with Michelle Bachman's eyes-from-the-cover-of-Newsweek.



Labels:

Comments

  1. Ross8/15/2011 1:25 PM

    He looks like he's trying to control my mind

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown8/24/2011 1:21 AM

    I don't think there's a politician serious about his craft who wouldn't like to play jedi mind tricks.

    As for the eyes, I think the next logical step is for someone to use them in some form of animation, preferably still on Mitt Romney.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I put it to you:

What is wrong with moustaches? Eh?
10 comments
Read more

For Every Problem, a Solution (2)

Each panel originally had a caption, a feature which was scrapped in a silly attempt to bring cohesiveness to the page as a whole.  They were as follows: panel 1 - Pig fingers!  Carrot hands!  Cannot draw! panel 2 - Focus off. panel 3 - Perspective is a matter of perspective. panel 4 - What, me worry? In thinking about it, I suppose I might have impanelled these in the orange bar at the right, but it probably would've been a bit much. ... I'm not sure how wide-spread the campaign is, but in  Seattle, there are numerous billboards and bus signs which read, "Jesus is ____."  I want to play mad libs with these things, or else write in, "a day labourer."  Other acceptable answers include, "bearded," and, "featured in a Leonard Cohen song."
6 comments
Read more

Sisyphus, as Per Camus:

Word.
7 comments
Read more