Skip to main content

Meandering

Jesus said something to the effect that he spoke in parables so those with ears for such stories might hear him and those without would confounded. Jesus was a clever sod, and nobody ever accused him of being humble, but he was fairly straightforward in this answer. He spoke in interesting stories and metaphors to bar people from following him when they might otherwise do so. In light of Christian doctrine, I suppose this is a bit cruel, especially when Jesus goes on about how bad it will be come judgment for those who saw him and didn't convert, but it could also be argued to be just--and I suppose this would be a defense of some nimble minded Christians.

Anyway, this all occurred to me earlier this evening when talking with my dad about not getting through to people on deep subjects, especially in writing. I'm not going to place myself up there with Jesus or Nietzsche in terms of dialectical strength or right to weep at misinterpretation (the poor bastards). Not at all. I'm just saying, sometimes I hop online or talk to an acquaintance, and it's almost like I can see the words just glancing off the top of the addressee's dome and careening into spaces unknown. Is this partially my fault? Yeah, I suppose it is. I've got a certain attachment to style, and a certain style on top of that. Sometimes, I might be interested in addressing something specialized or esoteric, which can only be presented appealingly to most people with the most careful of packaging and a rather ... cosmopolitan approach that I am loathe to take.

Paint me elitist. I'll let it dry with ambivalence.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous9/30/2005 8:57 PM

    Take heart, my little wing - elitism isn't for everyone!

    I was just cruising Charles Rozier's blog when I ran across your comment on his entry re: his fucking brilliant idea to apply logical arguement to, uh, the Gospel.

    I just got done sparring with him on Amber's blog, myself.
    http://amber.tangerinecs.com/viewentry.php?entry=750

    Glad to see other people out there are interested in rationale and logic! Bitchen.

    Color me impressed!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown10/20/2005 6:31 PM

    Hah. So I just caught this reply. Cool.

    Going to check Amber's entry in a bit. As to Charles, man, if I hadn't come prepared with a bit of philosophy in my pocket when I met the guy online he might have had me singing with the Chorus on Sundays. His program, as he has worked it out, is interesting, and some of the most appealing Christian thought I've seen outside Pascal. Being a staunch atheist, I guess that's saying something.

    Thanks for the encouraging words. It's always a pleasure to come across someone with whom I can truly converse, even as ephermeral as such meetings are on the net.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to a book that doesn't exist:

Prose and verse are generally accepted as distinct writing formats with their own rules, styles, and grammars.  Though their borders are somewhat vague, they have come to be seen as something of a dichotomy in the eyes of the general public.  There are, however, at least 3 other popular approaches to writing as exhibited in picture-books, comicbooks, and plays.  Though sometimes given short shrift, these styles are accepted as literature.  They are included in libraries, book stores, and academic study.  Most importantly, they are read. In the general case, there is clearly writing being done in the creation of any one of these.  But what of the wordless comic or silent play?  Should we consider scripts written, but fully realized plays, comics, and picture-books, to be performance, art, or some other kind of non-literature?  These worries of theory are kinks to be worked out, surely, but they are not of immediate practical concern to the writer...
12 comments
Read more

Magical Unrealism

The same men who say global warming is a hoax, Obamacare has been failing for eight years, and abstinence-only sex-ed works are also convinced even basic gun control is an impossible and useless approach which would only make us less safe. These are also the dudes most likely to tell you black and brown folk have it too good, Obama is a secret Muslim born in Kenya, and Sharia law is being forced on American legal systems. I wonder if there's some sort of overarching thread or theme to all this.
2 comments
Read more

Miike Takashi's Sukiyaki Western Django

I am a big fan of prolific Japanese director, Miike Takashi. His movies are not always good (which would be an accomplishment, considering he averages about three feature length films a year), but he doesn't mind experimenting or playing around. Not everything he tries works, but when it does, it can be pretty damn awesome. His subjects and genres vary wildly from a musical about a family running an inn, to a kid fighting goblins, to some of the best yakuza flicks I've seen. Meanwhile, he tends to get good performances from his actors, even when they are children or non-native Japanese speakers. The only time I've been completely disappointed with one of his pieces was a rejected instalment in Showtime's Masters of Horror , entitled 'Imprint'. The story was stupid, and the acting was bad. This was Miike's first all English production, and it showed. So, when I found out one of his 2007 films, Sukiyaki Western Django was in English, I was a bit put off. How ...
2 comments
Read more