Skip to main content

Sisyphus, as Per Camus:

Word.

Comments

  1. The ambiguity of that last panel (is the panel on the right the last panel? My thoughts depend on it being so...) seems apt to the quotation, I take it. He doesn't look happy, dancing with glee or reveling in satisfaction. It looks open just what's going on. In that sense, we have to force ourselves to imagine him as happy.

    I like the work of this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you.

    Yes, the panel on the right is the last panel, but one is meant to be made aware of it and take it into account after reading, "A brief moment". The idea is that one will naturally have one's eyes bounce there thanks to the intrusion of the boulder across panels, but that the flow of the panels and the presence of more text near the bottom of the page will bring the eyes back down and to the left, only taking full stock of the panel on the right (and resting there) after this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For some reason I always imagined that Sisyphus never actually got the rock over the mountain, but got really close to the top and then ran out of strength and it fell down the same side that he was pushing it up again. However in your version I assume that after he gets it over the mountain he has to start pushing it up the other side.

    I'm not sure why I would imagine it that way, or if it even makes a difference. I never actually read the whole thing, but rather one of my instructors in high school kind of gave an overview of it to us and then we read a selection.

    I think my version might be even more hopeless because at least in this comic version he gets a small success.

    Anways, the main thing I wanted to say is that the far right panel is cool and I think you drew Sisyphus falling backwards pretty well.

    Furthermore, it doesn't appear as though he has a loincloth on in the second panel. Did you add a loincloth later so that you wouldn't have to draw his crotch?

    And one last comment...it's difficult for me to read if Sisyphus is drenched in sweat in the third panel, or if those are shadows.

    Ok, and one final observation...I like the way you expressed the contours of the mountain.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps 'falling backwards' isn't the best way to put it. 'giving a final heave' would be more accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for your compliments. I certainly appreciate them.

    I drew this comic while waiting for a ride at work. I had the time to do it because, unbeknownst to me, my coworker had torn his hand open with a mop, and decided to keep going anyway. So. At work, I had a single pen (a Pilot G2 .7mm), and no pencils. I didn't have enough faith in my pen-work (especially at that width) to affix the loincloth after I had sketched out his body. The pen's width also played a role in decision to use a loincloth at all, though the main factors were my own modesty and inexperience drawing penises.

    In the third panel, I have come to think of the crosshatched elements as shadows and the blue bits as sweat, though I am not sure when I came to this conclusion. It was either after I coloured it, or during that process. Your confusion is understandable.

    As to Sisyphus and his rock, I'd always been told they both reached the top of the mountain before going back down. It's been some time since I read 'The Myth of Sisyphus', and I don't recall how Camus phrases it. The real question, though, is how did the ancient Greeks intend it. On that score, I am not sure.

    Admittedly, not even reaching the top might feel a bit worse, but it leaves open the possibility that reaching the top would offer an end to the travail. Which (if either) situation is more bleak seems a matter of perspective. But, then, most things are.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I did a little bit of research on wikipedia about Sisyphus and found several interesting things- The most relevant to your comic is number 3, so feel free to skip directly to that one.

    1. The plot about Death (Thanatos in the Sisyphus story) dieing and subsequently the laws of death being suspended for mortals is really, really old. I'd seen it on Family Guy before, and they're also doing a new TV series on Showtime I believe on this exact premise, and furthermore the NYTimes did a reflective piece on concept of aforementioned TV show.

    2. Sisyphus was a rascal, and kind of funny. To wit, "before King Sisyphus died, he had told his wife to throw his naked body into the middle of the public square (purportedly as a test of his wife's love for him). This caused King Sisyphus to end up on the shores of the river Styx. Then complaining to Persephone that this was a sign of his wife's disrespect for him, King Sisyphus persuaded her to allow him to go back to the upper world and scold his wife for not burying his body and giving him a proper funeral (as a loving wife should). Back in Corinth, King Sisyphus's spirit scolded his wife for not giving him a proper funeral. When King Sisyphus' spirit refused to return to the Underworld, he was forcibly dragged back to the Underworld by Hermes."

    If I ever get married and am on the brink of death, and assuming my wife is still healthy, I'm going to tell her to throw my naked body into the middle of a public square...

    3. According to wikipedia, Sisyphus never actually does get the rock over the 'steep hill'. Here are the two quotes from the article pertaining to this matter: "before he could reach the top of the hill, the rock would always roll back down, forcing him to begin again.", and " Zeus displayed his own cleverness by binding King Sisyphus to an eternity of frustration with the boulder rolling away from Sisyphus when he neared the top of the hill."

    So that's that, for what it's worth. . . Of course you do have artistic license with a comic, as you know...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to a book that doesn't exist:

Prose and verse are generally accepted as distinct writing formats with their own rules, styles, and grammars.  Though their borders are somewhat vague, they have come to be seen as something of a dichotomy in the eyes of the general public.  There are, however, at least 3 other popular approaches to writing as exhibited in picture-books, comicbooks, and plays.  Though sometimes given short shrift, these styles are accepted as literature.  They are included in libraries, book stores, and academic study.  Most importantly, they are read. In the general case, there is clearly writing being done in the creation of any one of these.  But what of the wordless comic or silent play?  Should we consider scripts written, but fully realized plays, comics, and picture-books, to be performance, art, or some other kind of non-literature?  These worries of theory are kinks to be worked out, surely, but they are not of immediate practical concern to the writer...

Every thief must go.

Robin , chapter 5  Previous Chapter Robin kept herself busy through her unemployment doing chores and practising martial arts, but mostly she spent time playing in the woods.  The bears avoided her, and she kept out of the thieves' way, as much as she could.  This was no easy task, for Sherman's Forest had its share of scoundrels. Chief of these was Lance Bucskin, infamous for scamming old ladies and still more renowned for his hatred of puppies, which he would kick whenever the chance arose.  Even his own men found his proclivities distasteful, but he had a way with weapons and highway robbery which held his fellows in awe. LANCE-- [clad in all green with a pointed cap; has a devil may care attitude; close cropped blond hair with a well waxed van dyke beard; 28 and in peak condition, he loves exhibiting his physical prowess as much as he enjoys booting little dogs; he is holding up a family as his rapt minions stand by] They're really not all that hard to im...

'((BORDERS))' & 'The Blue Trees' at Westlake Park

For the last few weeks, two public art projects have coexisted at Westlake Park, in the thick of Seattle's downtown. '((Borders))' is by Steinunn Thorarinsdottir , a metal sculptor who seems primarily interested in featureless people in various states and positions.  Originally installed outside of the U.N. headquarters, it is supposed to reflect something (or other) about multiculturalism.  Passersby seem most interested in the composition of the statues. Thoraninsdottir's site is pretty cool, by the way. Konstantin Dimopoulos's 'The Blue Trees' is meant to bring trees into contrast with their surroundings, and so remind people of them.  By extension, this is supposed to bring attention to deforestation, over-logging, and the like.  The actual effect is mere surreal wonderment, but anyone so confused can read the small sign standing in the middle of the park for clarification. I'm not sure how successful these are in achieving their stated int...